ORIENTS SOCIAL RESEARCH CONSULTANCY (OSRC) & PAKISTAN LANGUAGES AND HUMANITIES REVIEW (PLHR) adheres to Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License. The authors submitting and publishing in PLHR agree to the copyright policy under creative common license 4.0 (Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International license). Under this license, the authors published in PLHR retain the copyright including publishing rights of their scholarly work and agree to let others remix, tweak, and build upon their work non-commercially. All other authors using the content of PLHR are required to cite author(s) and publisher in their work. Therefore, ORIENTS SOCIAL RESEARCH CONSULTANCY (OSRC) & PAKISTAN LANGUAGES AND HUMANITIES REVIEW (PLHR) follow an Open Access Policy for copyright and licensing.
How to Cite
Derivational Productivity in the Urdu Motion Verbs’ Causative Alternation
Abstract
The present study explores the nature of derivational productivity with respect to the Urdu motion verbs’ causative alternation. More specifically, it addresses the questions of what types of derivational operations are involved in the causative alternation, how they differ in their productivity, and what factors constrain their productivity. The study collects data from multiple sources – lexical translation, Urdu Lughat, individual and dialogical introspection and acceptability judgment task – and frames data analysis in terms of Relational Morphology (Jackendoff & Audring, 2020). The study concludes that the main derivational processes involved in the Urdu motion verbs’ causative alternation include -a suffixing, base modification + -a suffixing and base modification in direct causatives, and -va suffixing and base modification + -va suffixing in indirect causatives; these derivational processes are gradient and dynamic with respect to their productivity; various sorts of constraints – phonological, morphological, syntactic and semantic – are responsible for the variable nature of the derivational productivity. These findings carry implications for the nature of linguistic knowledge: it is more likely to be constraint-based rather than rule-based, which includes both productive and nonproductive aspects of linguistic competence
Authors
Ahmad Naveed Sharif
PhD, Department of English & Linguistics, University of Otago, Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand
Jabbir Hussain
Lecturer, Division of Science & Technology, University of Education, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
Rauf Ahmad
Visiting Lecturer, Division of Science and Technology, University of Education, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
